Zefram wrote: > R869: "A person ... is permitted to register.". A team, even if organised > under the contract law of some state, is not a person.
I am finding your (in terms of Agoran law) baseless pronouncements on what is and is not a person rather tiresome. When I brought the idea to you in the first place, it hinged on the simple fact that dictionaries define "person" as a "partnership". The fact that you have construed a wide range of requirements for what constitutes a partnership is neither supported by Agoran law nor the dictionary that gave us the argument in the first place; to wit for partnership: "a relationship resembling a legal partnership and usually involving close cooperation between parties having specified and joint rights and responsibilities" I would say that a "team" certainly fits these qualifications. In other words, all the extra-legal statements you have made on what sort of agreement is a true, registerable partnership and what sort of agreement is not, and whether a non-Agoran agreement counts, is not supported either by Agoran Rules or the courts. I hope others aren't fooled and choose to test these boundaries if it benefits them. -Goethe
