On 5/29/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
root wrote: > And therein lies the problem with appealing the > judgments: in the event that they're overturned, they never existed, > and the appeal is thus just as invalid as the original judgments. Funny, that's exactly what I claimed when I said my deregistration paradox couldn't be resolved by appeal. But y'all didn't buy the logic then, and it seems to be resolved... -G.
I wasn't paying much attention at that point, or I probably would have agreed with you. -root
