Ed Murphy wrote: > (d) the action would, as part of its effect, make it impossible > to make arbitrary modifications to the rules by any > combinations of actions by players, and/or impossible to > adopt proposals within a four-week period; or
I'm not clear on how defining these things to be regulated prevents them from taking effect. Can you explain? I'm happy with combining the protection clauses, as long as it's in an effective form. -zefram
