Zefram wrote: > (a misnomer, btw: it's > distinctly a criminal procedure, whereas General CFJs are civil in > nature)
Not quite. The civil CFJ is set up as a civil court, with the judge's ability to assess damages for Agreement violations in R1742(i)-(iii) is a specifically Civil procedure, and the standard of proof being the preponderance of the evidence. In the special case where the agreement is "the rules", the procedure (standards and penalties) shift to a more criminal tone, but this is a secondary consideration, and there's no reason the tone of the specified penalties couldn't be more "civil" (e.g. monetary damages if a currency exists). -Goethe
