Ed Murphy wrote: >The only difference was the spurious line break in Rule 2139, >right?
Line break in the middle of a word, yes. > I just went back and checked my local message store; >neither the submission nor the purported distribution >contained the spurious line break, That's strange. In my copy, the purported distribution distinctly has the line break. The submission and the text quoted with the voting results both do not have the line break. The distribution that I'm talking about is message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. The character sequence in that region is actually "address \n(es)" (with a space before the newline). It's a text/plain message, with the format=flowed option, which is presumably related to the invisible space. -zefram
