On 6/8/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
root wrote:
> > All but the first paragraph is about enforcement. And as Goethe
> > recently pointed out, the current reading of the first paragraph is
> > just a truism.
>
> As, presumably, was the previous reading, since the current reading is
> just a generalization of the same.
No, the previous reading ("under the rules") created a mechanism for
players to say "we make this agreement with the intent that the
courts of Agora are a legal, binding method of dispute resolution
for this agreement."
That's not the previous reading I'm referring to. I agree that that
version of the rule was definitional in nature.
The only difference between the immediately previous revision and the
current revision is the replacement of the word "players" with
"persons".
-root
