On Sun, Jun 17, 2007 at 08:19:36AM +0100, Zefram wrote: > bd_ wrote: > >One idea I had was to transform B Nomic into an agoran Limited > >Partnership under rule 2145, > > This would be interesting. It raises the question of whether R1742 > agreements can actually be enforced on non-players. (R1742 used to > limit such agreements to players, and was amended without any real > consideration of this issue.)
B Nomic's rules can be amended to enforce Agoran agreement law, naturally - or we could leave it out and see what happens ;) > >One possibility to resolve this would be to amend r754 to permit > >a particular instrument to override the interpretation of certain > >specific terms within its own body > > Already being voted on, as proposal 5008. It needs to be more general > than just instruments; R1742 agreements, in particular, are not > instruments in the Agoran sense. Ah, missed that. Thanks. Incidentally, how does one use the proposal pool[1] site to look up by ID? I searched for '5008' in 'P#', type 'exact' with all status checks set, but nothing came up. [1] - http://www.periware.org/agora/pool.php linked from http://www.agoranomic.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
