Murphy wrote: > These are covered by Rule 1891 (Legislative Orders). This doesn't > extend to attempts to impose requirements on all players, since > Rule 1793 (Orders) requires Orders to have a single target.
Ah yes, by precedent (eg CFJs 1377, 1385), "Be it Hereby Resolved that X is Y" is a legislative order for the recordkeepor of X to note that X is Y, and for game obligations (for everyone) to arise accordingly. One could argue "no recordkeepor" = "no target" = "invalid order". -Goethe
