On Wednesday 20 June 2007, Ian Kelly wrote: > * Abuse VCs. A player who controls a partnership can use the > partnership's VCs to raise eir own voting limit, and eir own VCs to > raise the partnership's voting limit, at a cost of 1 VC per vote. A > player outside of a partnership must resort to actual diplomacy to > achieve the same efficiency, or else just pay 2 VCs per vote, as Rule > 2126 intends.
But using the partnership's VLOP or VCs requires diplomacy in any case, although it does indeed allow for more efficient VC usage. Of course I suppose this could be taken to extremes, e.g. an agreement that would submit an Ordinary proposal for any player, then (if it passed) use the resulting VCs on its author.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
