Murphy wrote: > Hmm. If this is judged true, are there any other proposals that > we "corrected" due to CFJs with implicit knock-on effects, when > in fact we should have stuck with the originally-announced result > due to R2034?
I honestly can't think of any corrections in the last couple years outside of things that were caught immediately, the abortion scam is the only potential candidate and I think all associated results were challenged immediately. Also, if we so "corrected" illegally, surely time passed after the corrections, so now those corrections are similarly safe! -Goethe
