Taral wrote: >I'm not sure you've implemented the useful contents of these rules in >your substitute.
Some of them are just not implemented yet. I plan to retain the essence of "Linked Statements" and "Pragmatic Judicial Assignments" in the new version of "The Standing Court". (I can do them much more efficiently.) I intend to put "Excess CFJs" in somewhere. "Late Judgement" is already there (third paragraph of "Judicial Questions"). I don't think "Always an Eligible Judge" is achieving anything useful, particularly in the presence of "The Standing Court". I've already proposed its repeal. "Judgements Must Accord with the Rules" and "Standards of Proof" are partly there, in appropriate places. For example, the higher standard of proof in criminal cases is built into the judgement options. I should probably adopt more from these rules. -zefram
