On 7/5/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
> By doing so, it provides redundancy to
>official duties and thus eliminates a considerable amount of ruletext
>designed to compensate for officers who fail in their duties.
I don't think there's much such rule text. The main one is Timing
Orders, but you don't remove that. Your proto removes rule text mostly
by removing functionality.
-zefram
Maybe I should clarify. Much of the functionality removed is no longer
needed when there is a redundant backup for an office. For example,
there is no longer a need for a vote collector replacement process
when a Committee fills the role of Assessor. There is no need to
account for a vacant office when no offices will be left vacant, etc.
BobTHJ
