P.S. Why isn't Primo judging its cases, anyway?
On 7/10/07, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I object. I intend, without 2 objections, to change Zefram to lying
down. I intend, without objection, to make Zefram inactive.
On 7/10/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As Primo Corporation is not judging its assigned cases, I intend to
> change it to lying down, without 2 objections. (I'll be able to do
> that under the fifth paragraph of rule 1871/11 if I'm CotC at the time,
> which seems a likely turn of events.)
>
> -zefram
>
