On Saturday 04 August 2007, Zefram wrote: > I hereby recuse root from CFJ 1709. I hereby assign comex as judge of > CFJ 1709. > > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1709 >
Proto-judgement: Considering the statement: > Statement: rule 1742's obligation to act in accordance with contracts > is binding on non-player parties to R1742 contracts At the time of the calling of this CFJ, Rule 1503 was obsolete because of criminal cases. Criminal cases can punish non-players, such as with EXILE which is a reasonable punishment even if the person in question has no intention to follow the Rules. Rule 101 (v) could apply, except that non-player parties would necessarily have to review the Rules in order to intend that the agreement be governed by them. Therefore, TRUE.
