On 9/28/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I furthermore believe that your message cannot be interpreted as > > initiating two separate cases, because it was clearly not your intent > > to do so. > > Correct.
Er. To clarify, I meant that your interpretation of my intent was correct. My intent, however, does not necessarily correlate to the effect of the announcement. I think it is clear that my announcement must have initiated at least one case, as it met the requirements of both R591 and R1504. Whether it in fact initiated just an inquiry case, just a criminal case, an inquiry case and a criminal case, or an inquiry/criminal case is the interesting question. -root
