Roger Hicks wrote:
>Digits are a currency that is owned by Players. There are ten types of
>Digits, represented by the numbers 0 through 9. All Digits of the same
>numerical value are fungible.

You want "Each type of Digit is a currency.".

>                A player may not Digit Dash a number if e does not
>possess the required digits to lose.

"CANNOT".

>After an Ordinary Proposal is distributed, but before voting ends, any
>Player MAY Digit Dash the ID number of that proposal by announcement.
>This has the effect of increasing eir EVLOP on that Proposal by two.

"eir voting limit on that proposal".  EVLOP is not per-proposal, but
voting limit is.

>After a Democratic Proposal is distributed, but before voting ends,
>any Player MAY Digit Dash the ID number of that proposal to gain three
>marks of the color of eir choice.

Marks and VCs should never be available in arbitrary colours.

>When the CotC publishes a CFJ, but before that CFJ is answered, any
>player MAY Digit Dash the ID number of that CFJ by announcement to
>increase or decrease the Elevation of a Player by 1.

What's Elevation?

>                                                      A Player who has
>never owned a land MAY gain a land of eir choice by announcement.

Such as a land that is currently owned by someone else?

>An Expression Factory is a type of land. Each Expression Factory has a
>corresponding mathematical expression, which is set by its owner at
>its time of creation.

After the last time you protoed this, I came up with the optimal
expression for Expression Factories.  Suppose you have two Digit Ranches,
one generating 0 digits and one generating 1 digits.  An Expression
Factory with the expression

        11 * (2 + 4X + 2Y + Z)

will generate any of the other eight digit types, depending on the pattern
of 0s and 1s put into its inputs.  It's only slightly more complicated
when the two Digit Ranches available generate other digit types.  I think
this is such an easily dominant strategy that the kind of gameplay you're
looking for will never arise.

>The Banker is an Office.

Spell it "Bankor", please.

-zefram

Reply via email to