Wooble wrote:
5339 D0 2 Murphy Andre's degreeAGAINST [Suber's Rule 211 solves this paradox, contrary to the thesis' assertion that no change to the rules could deal with it effectively]
Disagree. Suber's Rule 211 only addresses M-M and I-I conflicts. Andre's thesis examines the analogue of Suber's Rule 110 (an I rule saying that M-I is always won by I), and hypothesizes a M rule saying that M-I is always won by M.
