On Dec 3, 2007 10:25 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/3/07, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > doing nkep itself is still an action which has no actual changes > > associated with it. The Fookiemyartug contract simply causes something > > to happen when nkep occurs. I could make a contract that says: > > I think you just killed your own argument. :/ > This doesn't mean nkep is not an action then. Clearly, the Fookiemyartug contract identifies it to be an action, as did the wording of your original CFJ on the matter. It simply has no direct effect, only an indirect one via the Fookiemyartug contract.
BobTHJ
