On Dec 3, 2007 10:52 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/3/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ian Kelly wrote: > > >I do not consent. With the nkep scam fully exposed, > > > > How was it exposed, btw? Who leaked? > You know, when I called CFJ 1799 I fully intended nkep to be nonsense. > Don't confuse that attempted scam with this new nkep-means-win scam.
So you're saying that Fookiemyartug could not have contained that text at the time CFJ 1799 was called? In that case, I move to SUSTAIN in 1799a and OVERTURN with FALSE in 1805a. -root
