Ed Murphy wrote: >We've been waiting for this correction for over a month now.
Yeah, sorry. Lack of tuits. >Per CFJs 1710 and 1711, Proposal 5085 (affecting Rules 1367 and 1370) >was not adopted on July 22 or 23, but was adopted on July 31. Between >July 22 and 31, Proposals 5088, 5090-91, 5096-97, and 5101-06 were >adopted, but none of them affected or were affected by Rules 1367 or >1370. Thus, the SLR should be unaffected, and the FLR should just >need this: Huh? You're talking as if proposal 5085 is the only one affected. It's not; proposals 5081-5087 were all adopted out of the sequence we originally thought. Proposal 5081, for a start, amended rule 1023 which was earlier amended by proposal 5102; we had thought that those amendments occurred in the opposite order. This correction is not trivial. I'm working on it now. -zefram
