On Dec 10, 2007 5:12 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It was important to my argument that "objection" was contained visibly > in the URI. While I sympathize with the incompatability, my browser had no > issues, and in a precedent where others' could see something that my browser > didn't handle (the MIME headers issue of a little while ago) it was still > valid, so there's a precedent there (it annoyed me at the time, you see).
Why did you not respond to the poll I conducted on it at the time? -root
