On Dec 11, 2007 12:12 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 11, 2007 1:30 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is there a reason you prefer this to REMAND with instructions? > > To spare everyone from more unnecessary consideration of the case? I > suppose it's a philosophical question of what the purpose of an > appeals panels should be.
That's my reasoning as well. In consideration of the original judge, I would also consent to REMAND with instructions to either judge according to the actual gamestate or just IRRELEVANT. -root
