Wow, I feel really dumb. Five elephants. . . One is at the default location. . . Got it. . .
avpx On Dec 11, 2007 6:56 PM, Nick Vanderweit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You say there are elephants over there. However, in this rule, there > are elephants only in the cardinal directions. Thus, there is a > conflict here. > > Perhaps you are trying to win by paradox? > > avpx > > > On Dec 9, 2007 7:17 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I create the following proposal: > > "Elephants" > > Create the following rule: > > There are 5 elephants. > > There is an elephant switch, known as Elephant Location; its valid > > values are > > North, South, East, West, and Over There (default). It is tracked > > by the > > Department of Mental Health. > > > > Upon adoption of this proposal: four elephants have their Elephant Location > > set to the cardinal directions. > > > > I create the following proposal: > > "Hats" > > Create the following rule: > > There is a person switch, known as Hat-Wearing; its valid values > > are Wearing > > and Not Wearing (default). It is tracked by the Department of > > Mental Health. > > A person may toggle their Hat-Wearing by announcement; this is > > "putting on" > > or "taking off" a hat. > > > > Upon adoption of this proposal, Murphy puts on a hat. > > >
