On 12/12/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The action was without 2 objections, not with Agoran consent.
And the original intent was stated as "without 3 objections".
> However, I think that was a list of ballot options rather than a
> tally, so the resolution is probably ineffective anyway.
True.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
