On Dec 12, 2007 3:40 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 12 December 2007, Ian Kelly wrote: > > > What about little-endian binary? > > I would interpret "binary" to mean "binary numeral system" rather than > > "binary data encoding". I've never seen any version of Arabic > > numerals that was little-endian. > > > > -root > > Not sure what you mean there, but I was referring to e.g. 110 = 3 > > If that is not allowed, then I will have to revise my submission...
I mean that I think that format is perfectly reasonable for storage but not for display. -root
