On Dec 14, 2007 3:07 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > root wrote: > > > The advantage to being a party to a contract is the security granted > > by that contract. I've never supported granting players extra rights > > just for making contracts, which is effectively what partnerships do. > > What was/is your take on Groups?
Good point, I may have overstated a bit. I liked groups. They weren't as troublesome because they only granted extra votes (ironically only on democratic proposals, which would be unthinkable in the current climate). Also, their domains were first-order rather than second-order, and IIRC a player could only be in one group at a time, both of which helped to limit their abusability. -root
