On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Charles Reiss wrote: > Since partnerships now need to be public contracts to be persons, > couldn't you have done this by announcement (no Support needed)?
I guess I could have! :) -Goethe
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Charles Reiss wrote: > Since partnerships now need to be public contracts to be persons, > couldn't you have done this by announcement (no Support needed)?
I guess I could have! :) -Goethe