Ian Kelly wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 3:51 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Levi wrote:
Is it worth considering the decision that was almost made before for
this appeal?
Yes, I had forgotten about this. (I wasn't on the panel at the time,
so I just filed it away in case it led to an actual panel action.)
Having considered it more carefully, I stand by my opinion that comex
should have asked pikhq whether e performed the alleged action, but
agree that pikhq should also have provided that information without
having to be asked. I also believe that comex should investigate the
possibility that Steve Wallace is a representative of a nomic, in
which case sending a message to em may be tantamount to sending a
message to that nomic.
Accordingly, I intend to cause the panel to judge REMAND (and I
pre-emptively consent to either Levi or root doing the same).
I consent to this.
-root
I consent to this
Levi
