On Jan 14, 2008 8:35 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > comex wrote: > >As a non-officeholder I don't always read in detail every single > >public message > > That's why I put the judge's name and the CFJ number in the subject line > of each assignment message. And, for that matter, why each assignment > is the main topic of a message, rather than buried in a message that > has other concerns. I presume you are referring to the format that I had been using as CotC-- while less than two months a player.
I also presume you have not noticed that I had switched to the verbose format shortly before I was dismissed. Naturally, however, if (say) a CFJ is submitted buried in a message that has other concerns, as an officeholder I will notice and process them. In fact, I will probably be somewhat more lenient with what is required to submit a CFJ than you have been-- something else that speeds up the court system, because requiring CFJs to be resubmitted is counterproductive.
