On Feb 1, 2008 7:57 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We've had past judgements that a modified X is a wholly different thing > than an unmodified X. For example, a Limited Executor is a thing of > itself which has wholly different properties than an Executor (if > both are defined in the rules). > > So I think based on this, a "public document" is a single game object > (e.g. noun) if it has a specific legal significance. Other opinions?
I think that a "game object" is not the same thing as a noun, which is a purely grammatical construct. -root
