Zefram wrote:
comex wrote:Rule 208 only requires a tally of valid ballots. AGAINT is not a valid ballot no matter its interpretation, so the appeal was successful even if I misreported invalid ballots.I believe we have a precedent of treating "FOR" as a synonym for "SUPPORT" and "AGAINST" as a synonym for "OBJECT" in decisions on dependent actions. They seem eminently reasonable substitutions, which fall under the purview of R754(1).
Correct, CFJ 1764.
