Proto-Proposal: Intelligent Dependent Action reporting, AI-2.
[I don't think this clashes with Proposal 5418 changes, I could be wrong]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
[To resolve a dependent action, you just have to report the voters
casting the appropriate type of vote: SUPPORT for with Support,
OBJECT for without Objection, both for Consent. You no longer count
yourself in support. You still have to identify the (valid) voters.]
Amend Rule 1728 (Dependent Actions) by replacing:
(b) The available options are SUPPORT and OBJECT.
with:
(b) The available options are a subset of SUPPORT and
OBJECT, as defined by the specific method of dependent
action.
and by replacing:
(d) The eligible voters are those entities that were active
first-class players at the start of the voting period,
except for any entities disqualified by the rule specifying
that the action can be performed dependently.
with:
(d) The eligible voters are those entities that were active
first-class players at the start of the voting period,
except for the initiator of the decision and any entities
disqualified by the rule specifying that the action can be
performed dependently.
Amend Rule 2124 (Methods of Dependent Actions) to read:
The following methods of dependent actions are defined:
(a) With N Supporters. For this method, the support index is
N and the available option is SUPPORT. "With Support" is
synonymous with "With 1 Supporter".
(b) Without N Objections. For this method, the objection index
is N and the available option is OBJECT. "Without Objection"
is synonymous with "Without 1 Objection".
(c) With N Agoran Consent. For this method, the majority index
is N and the available options are SUPPORT and OBJECT. "With
Agoran Consent" is synonymous with "With 1/2 Agoran Consent".
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
