Kerim Aydin wrote:
>[Since the fix is about reporting, not the count, keeps the current method
>of first/second class vote counting and eligibility,
I was going to suggest separating these two bits if it got any more
complicated.
> the tally of votes need only include a count of up to N valid
> ballots other than the initiator's if the initiator's implicit
> support is a valid ballot, or N+1 valid ballots if it is not,
> even if there are more.
I don't think the "up to N valid ballots" is what you really intend,
and it's definitely unclear. How about
the tally of votes only needs to include N+1 valid votes if there
are more, or all valid votes if there are not.
> is synonymous with "Without 1 Objection". A tally of votes
> MUST include all valid ballots up to a count of N to resolve
> the decision, but needn't include more.
Similarly
the tally of votes only needs to include N valid votes if there
are more, or all valid votes if there are not.
I suggest that you also ament rule 1728 to make the implicit SUPPORT
ballot explicitly conditional on SUPPORT being a valid vote value.
-zefram
