root wrote: > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Ben Caplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Replace paragraph c) with the following: >> >> c) Exactly one recordkeepor who tracks instances of that switch. >> >> i) If the type of switch's backing document is an instrument, >> then the switch's recordkeepor must be an officer in order >> for the switch definition to be effective. That officer's >> report includes the value of each instance of that switch >> whose value is not its default value, or which has no >> default value. >> >> ii) Otherwise, the switch's recordkeepor must be a party to >> the type of switch's backing document in order for the >> switch definition to be effective. The recordkeepor SHALL >> weekly publish the value of each instance of that switch >> whose value is not its default value, or which has no >> default value. > > There must be some way of making this cleaner.
By generalizing "weekly duties" beyond officers?
