On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:35 AM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > A judicial panel CAN send messages by means of any of its > > members sending a message identified as being from the panel, > > with the unanimous Support of the panel's members... > > Does "the unanimous Support of the panel's members" include the > support of the panelist performing the dependent action? 'Cause R2124 > says e can't.
For the reason stated above, I intend to veto Proposal 5490 unless somebody talks me out of it. -root
