On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 11:22 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It could be justified by saying that anything that is a report on the > > gamestate should go to a-o, whereas anything that changes the gamestate > or > > disputes a report of the gamestate should go to a-b. > > That's not a very clean distinction. Ignoring as a technicality the > fact that publishing a report necessarily changes the gamestate, there > are some things that are essentially "reports" yet have a substantial > effect on the gamestate. Voting results on proposals are a good > example. > > -root > Hmm. You've got a point there. There is definitely a way to make a distinction though. It's just too late at night for me to think about it. -- -----Iammars www.jmcteague.com
