On Fri, 25 Apr 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * COMMUNITY SERVICE with a task (the perscribed task),
>> appropriate for when the ninny has failed to do something that e was
>> required to do or in other situations with a similar severity as FINE.
>> When in effect, the ninny is in the chokey from one week after the
>> sentence takes effect to the time e completes the perscribed task.
>> A judge SHALL NOT assign a task that the ninny cannot perform.
> The only difference between this and what we have seen can already be
> done with CHOKEY is that this has no upper bound on duration. I don't
> think removing that is a good idea in general. For example, what if
> the ninny is able to perform the task at the time it's assigned but
> later becomes unable?
Alternative is hard-coding the current precedent:
Amend 1502 by appending the following text to the paragraph beginning with
"* CHOKEY":
The judge, in specifying a duration for the Chokey, MAY also
specify a task (community service) for the ninny to perform; this
is appropriate if the task is equitable with the severity of the
rules breach. The ninny MAY announce the completion of the
task, which a priori is assumed to end the sentence, unless a
further criminal case finds the ninny UNAWARE, EXCUSED, or
GUILTY of the crime of falsely announcing the task's completion.
