On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 4:12 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I initiate a criminal case against the above pledge for violating Rule > 2029 by not Dancing a Powerful Dance.
Fails. The defendant must be a person. > I initiate a criminal case against myself for violating Rule 2029 by > not Dancing a Powerful Dance. UNIMPUGNED. See CFJs 1881 and 1816. > I award myself one Marvy and initiate a criminal case against it for > violating Rule 2029 by not Dancing a Powerful Dance. Fails. The defendant must be a person. I'm not sure what the point of all this was, but if you're trying to create a new player by interaction of the contracts, that fails too. The combined effect is either to create a new set of entities and declare them to be players (fails because contracts aren't granted the authority to create players); or to declare that the existing set of players are a currency (fails per the first sentence of R2166). -root
