On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It seems to me the contract is basically unenforceable. R1742, which > requires its parties to adhere to it, has lower power than Rule 105, > which restricts the ways by which entities can become rules. Nonsense. The contract just requires that we *pretend* that it's a rule, something regulated by no rule except R2149.
- DIS: Re: BUS: An unconventional way to create a rule Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: An unconventional way to create a rule Ian Kelly
- Re: DIS: Re: BUS: An unconventional way to create a r... comex

