root wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> (b) either the performer was the initiator, or the performer has >> supported the action and the rule allowing the action to be >> performed dependently does not explicitly prohibit supporters >> from performing it, > > R2136 should have such an explicit prohibition for becoming or > replacing the contestmaster of a contest, since the net effect depends > on the identity of the acting player.
The new clause needs to generally exclude actions whose satisfaction doesn't depend on support, which includes both of the R2136 procedures you mentioned. On an unrelated note, R2138(c) needs to be fixed to match the new R2154.
