On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am an Agoran, and also a player of IRCnomic. However, I have not (from an > Agoran point of view) knowingly joined comex's contract, if it is one. Many > IRCnomic rules conflict with Agoran rules anyway. (Doesn't Agora define > Player differently, for instance?)
Redefining player in a contract is fine, but of course the contract's definition likely only applies to contractual affairs. (According to R754 player only has the Agoran meaning "by default". And, heck, that definition probably doesn't apply throughout the Agoran rules, as R101 takes precedence over the rule that purportedly defines "player", despite using the term, and R101's meaning certainly shouldn't be compromised by lower-level rules creatively redefining things.) - woggle
