On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 11:19 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 11:16 PM, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 5. As in 4, but in discussion forum. > > 6. As in 4, but in private emails. > > 7. As in 4, but on phone/chat/ephemeral medium. > > Rule 2149/8 doesn't apply to any of these three, so none of these are > > a contract. > > I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement. The de facto > precedent is that privately formed contracts are allowed; for example, > IIRC, I never explicitly consented to the public forum to join the > AFO, but rather by email to its other members. > This doesn't stop two people from stating that something is a contract in a private manner. It just means that two people agreeing in a discussion forum isn't necessarily a contract. You can still make a formal contract in private e-mails, you just have to say it's a contract.
-- -----Iammars www.jmcteague.com
