On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 4. But nothing in the above set of events "made" the agreement a > contest. The contest says it is, but that doesn't automatically > trigger that condition.
Actually, it doesn't, apart from using the term contestmaster. The judgement is what says it's a contest, not the contract itself. -root
