On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In other > words, doing something W/O objection is *not* something you could > legally do without allowing for true (dependent on others) review. I never said it was. It is, however, something I could *generally* do. Rule 2169 does not use the "without allowing for review" qualifier that you insist on adding. One more analogy, and I'll keep it within Agora's dependent action system this time. I can deregister a player who has been inactive for three months without objection. Deregistering such a player, then, is something I could do, especially considering that I have in fact done just that in the past. -root
