On 08:49 Wed 09 Apr , Ed Murphy wrote: > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1918 > > ========================= Criminal Case 1918 ========================= > > pikhq breached Rule 2135 by misrepresenting Agora on the Nomic > Wiki by failing to include my name in the players list. > > ======================================================================== > > Caller: Iammars > Barred: pikhq > > Judge: OscarMeyr > Judgement: GUILTY > > ======================================================================== > > History: > > Called by Iammars: 27 Mar 2008 00:28:30 GMT > Defendant pikhq informed: 30 Mar 2008 22:24:19 GMT > Pre-trial phase ended: 06 Apr 2008 22:24:19 GMT > Assigned to OscarMeyr: 07 Apr 2008 02:28:10 GMT > Judged GUILTY by OscarMeyr: 09 Apr 2008 01:11:19 GMT > > ======================================================================== > > Gratuitous Arguments by Iammars: > > I don't know if I can add this in, but the first case is supposed to be > in the > timeframe of the month of January. > > ======================================================================== > > Gratuitous Arguments by pikhq: > > Guilty as charged. > > ======================================================================== > > Judge OscarMeyr's Arguments: > > [sentences from different cases are served concurrently; sentence > interpreted as invalid because it does not clearly specify either > two concurrent 30-day or two concurrent 60-day durations] > > As Defendant pikhq has pleaded guilty, I rule GUILTY on CFJs 1918 > and 1919. (This makes pikhq the ninny.) > > I observe that as of now the player list on Nomic Wiki *still* has > not been updated. As the violation addressed in these CFJs is of > an ongoing nature, I sentence the ninny to CHOKEY for 30 days per > CFJ = 60 days total, or until e updates the player list with > accurate current information, whichever comes first. (The ninny > holds the key to eir own chokey; e may open the door whenever e > sees fit.) > > ======================================================================== > > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1919 > > ========================= Criminal Case 1919 ========================= > > pikhq breached Rule 2135 by neglecting his duty to update the > Nomic Wiki page in the month of February. > > ======================================================================== > > Caller: Iammars > Barred: pikhq > > Judge: OscarMeyr > Judgement: GUILTY > > ======================================================================== > > History: > > Called by Iammars: 27 Mar 2008 00:28:30 GMT > Defendant pikhq informed: 30 Mar 2008 22:24:19 GMT > Pre-trial phase ended: 06 Apr 2008 22:24:19 GMT > Assigned to OscarMeyr: 07 Apr 2008 02:28:10 GMT > Judged GUILTY by OscarMeyr: 09 Apr 2008 01:11:19 GMT > > ======================================================================== > > Caller's Arguments: > > At that time the page not only included an incorrect playerlist, but also > wrote that many jobs were empty, which were filled by the end of January. > > ======================================================================== > > Gratuitous Arguments by pikhq: > > Guilty as charged. > > ======================================================================== > > Judge OscarMeyr's Arguments: > > [sentences from different cases are served concurrently; sentence > interpreted as invalid because it does not clearly specify either > two concurrent 30-day or two concurrent 60-day durations] > > As Defendant pikhq has pleaded guilty, I rule GUILTY on CFJs 1918 > and 1919. (This makes pikhq the ninny.) > > I observe that as of now the player list on Nomic Wiki *still* has > not been updated. As the violation addressed in these CFJs is of > an ongoing nature, I sentence the ninny to CHOKEY for 30 days per > CFJ = 60 days total, or until e updates the player list with > accurate current information, whichever comes first. (The ninny > holds the key to eir own chokey; e may open the door whenever e > sees fit.) > > ========================================================================
I would like to object to this charge; it is, at best, unfair to sentence someone when they are on hold, and therefore not keeping up with Agora. I have not had the opportunity to appeal this sentence whatsoever; I feel that, in this manner, my Rule 101 rights have been violated.
