Ian Kelly wrote: >By the way, I think it's worth noting that R2169 doesn't actually >remove the effect of the original judgement just because it was >appealed, but rather delegates that to "the usual processes":
It does, but not to the "usual processes" that you cite. The usual
process of an appeal revokes the judgement. R911:
When an appeal case is initiated, the prior question is
suspended, and remains so until the question on disposition in
the appeal case is judged.
-zefram
