,  s ay alweve lot
eosodblf l 'a lixi
snirasiat,srhbafic.P
reht urro ae eeeuada
u t ora.nom ,er,qlev
oc oidr  fedgn   lti
cayftutMf hin nntyat
 nr cmioitcsiuios cr
f rru bs hscss tuaoa
Ocaedart,e used jdv

>                                                               ehteoG-
>       too many though.  It's certainly not the easiest thing to type.
>       gniht eno eb yam pot ot mottob eht gniddA  .secitcarp eno sa daer
>     surprisingly easy to get used to, and (more to the point) faster to  
>     dna tnetsisnoc saw tfel ot thgir enil txen eht neht thgir ot tfel
>  that reading lines that alternated in the fashion of first one being 
>  (siht daer I erehw tegrof I) desoporp ylsuoires saw ti taht rebmemer I
>    One can be trained to read smoothly in a varity of forms, after all;
>    .llew ytterp wolf ot sdnet ti neht dna desu dohtem eht ot sa thgisni
>   Actually, I didn't find it so hard.  One simply must have a momentary
On Wednesday 14 May 2008 12:07:56 Kerim Aydin wrote:

Reply via email to