Ivan Hope wrote: > I submit a proposal, titled "Recordkeepors must recordkeep", with an > adoption index of 2: > > In rule 2166, replace the following paragraph: > > "The recordkeepor of a class of assets is the entity defined as such > by its backing document. That entity's report includes a list of all > instances of that class and their owners. This portion of that > entity's report is self-ratifying." > > with: > > "The recordkeepor of a class of assets is the entity defined as such > by its backing document. If the recordkeepor is an office, that > office's report includes a list of all instances of that class and > their owners. This portion of that office's report is self-ratifying. > If the recordkeepor is a person, that person SHALL publish a list of > all instances of that class and their owners once per week. Such a > list is self-ratifying."
This should really generalize R2143 to non-offices, or possibly define non-rule-defined recordkeepors as imposed offices.
