On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Who supported this? Wooble didn't (at least not in the above-quoted > message); instead, e announced intent to make eir own attempt.
I did right after e first annouced eir intent, and Ivan Hope CXXVII supported as well, after it was pointed out that Goethe's support was nttpf. I was urged to withdraw my support by someone who shall remain nameless, who claimed that comex had a plan to use the EC to make arbitrary changes to the gamestate. This was accompanied by a redacted chat log from IRCNomic in which comex allegedly detailed the loophole that would allow this (conveniently, the actual loophole was the part that was redacted), along with the threat of real-world legal action by the owners of the IRCNomic server since distributing chat logs is apparently against their policy. It's all a bit too much high school drama for me, but really I want to see comex's planned scam, with the added bonus of forcing some recent activist judges into supine posture. --Wooble
