2008/6/12 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Compromise on SHA-1? > Probably.
Or... SHA-512. It's no harder to implement than SHA-1 (mostly), it is a lot slower, but meh. Note that 2ch BBSs get quite well with a short substring of a crypt() call! Though, they can be cracked in about a week. Their defense is that not many people care all that much but I could envision a scam with it. ehird
